We find that the court properly sustained petitioners' objections as to the key answers to questions 5, 15, 31, and 73, applying the standard that the "answer given by the candidates on the test is better or at least as good" as the key answer supplied by respondent, in accord with the procedures outlined in Matter of Acosta v Lang (
Also, the court properly extended the duration of the special list for a...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.