TIEDEMAN BY TIEDEMAN v. MORGAN

No. C1-88-1725.

435 N.W.2d 86 (1989)

Scott Dean TIEDEMAN, By and Through his legal guardians, Verdean TIEDEMAN and Judy Tiedeman, and Verdean Tiedeman and Judy Tiedeman, individually, Appellants, v. Robert MORGAN, et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied March 29, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Douglas E. Schmidt, Sieben, Grose, Von Holtum, McCoy & Carey, Minneapolis, for appellants.

James H. Turk, Blethen, Gage & Krause, Mankato, Gale E. Fisher, Fisher & Hughes, Sioux Falls, S.D., for respondents.

Heard, considered and decided by CRIPPEN, P.J., and BOWEN and STONE, JJ.


OPINION

CRIPPEN, Judge.

Appellant, who suffered severe brain damage after an episode of heart failure, challenges a summary judgment in favor of members of a family appellant was visiting when his episode of illness occurred. We reverse the trial court conclusion that respondents are immune from liability under Minnesota's Good Samaritan statute.

FACTS

On April 15, 1986, appellant Scott Tiedeman, then age 17, was visiting in the home of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases