SACKETT, Judge.
Defendant-appellant Luke Charles Goodon contends evidence of his breathalyzer test should have been suppressed in his trial for driving under the influence because (1) the test was suppressed in an administrative proceeding, and (2) he was denied the opportunity to have an independent test conducted.
Defendant was arrested for driving under the influence. He consented to an intoxilyzer test. Defendant was told he had the right to an independent...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
