DOE v. ROE

No. 88-1699.

151 Wis.2d 366 (1989)

444 N.W.2d 437

Jane DOE, by her Guardian ad Litem, and John Doe, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Richard ROE, M.D., Defendant-Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

Decided June 14, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

On behalf of the plaintiffs-appellants, the cause was submitted on the briefs of Timothy J. Aiken and Robert L. Jaskulski of Aiken & Mawice, S.C. of Milwaukee.

On behalf of the defendant-respondent, the cause was submitted on the brief of Randal N. Arnold, Esq. and Susan R. Tyndall, Esq. of Kluwin, Dunphy, Hinshaw, Culbertson of Milwaukee.

Before Scott, C.J., Brown, P.J., and Nettesheim, J.


NETTESHEIM, J.

Jane Doe appeals from the disclosure provisions of a protective order entered in her medical malpractice case against Richard Roe, M.D.1

During trial, Doe's counsel notified the trial court that Doe had tested positive for the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), which causes acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). See sec. 146.025(1)(b), Stats. Doe is not presently suffering from AIDS. However,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases