1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Misc.2d
  4. 144 Misc.2d
  5. 144 Misc.2d 364 (1989)
 

TORKEL v. TORKEL

144 Misc.2d 364 (1989)

Geraldine Torkel, Plaintiff, v. Mark Torkel, Defendant.

Supreme Court, Queens County.

August 7, 1989

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Howard G. O'Rourke for plaintiff. Mark Torkel, defendant pro se.

ALFRED D. LERNER, J.

This is an uncontested action for a divorce. The action was commenced by the service of a summons with notice, but no complaint. A question has arisen as to whether a judgment may be granted without such a complaint in view of section 202.21 (i) (2) of the Uniform Rules for Trial Courts (22 NYCRR), which provides:

"(i) Additional requirements in respect to undefended matrimonial actions. * * *

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases