1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ill.
  4. 179 Ill.
  5. 179 Ill. App.3d 325 (1989)
 

VINCENT DiVITO, INC. v. VOLLMAR CLAY PROD. CO.

No. 87-3286.

179 Ill. App.3d 325 (1989)

534 N.E.2d 575

VINCENT DiVITO, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. VOLLMAR CLAY PRODUCTS COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee and Third-Party Plaintiff (Armco, Inc., Third-Party Defendant).

Appellate Court of Illinois — First District (5th Division).

Opinion filed February 3, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gerald L. Angst, Richard J. O'Brien, and Gerard D. Kelly, all of Sidley & Austin, of Chicago, for appellant.

Torshen, Schoenfield & Spreyer, Ltd., of Chicago (Jerome H. Torshen, Abigail K. Spreyer, and James K. Genden, of counsel), for appellee.

Affirmed in part, and reversed in part and remanded.

JUSTICE COCCIA delivered the opinion of the court:

Plaintiff, Vincent DiVito, Inc., appeals from: (1) the denial of its motion for summary judgment on a cause of action seeking promissory estoppel; (2) the granting of defendant Vollmar Clay Products Company's cross-motion for summary judgment on DiVito's promissory estoppel cause of action; and (3) the granting of Vollmar's cross-motion for summary judgment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases