1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 147 A.D.2d
  5. 147 A.D.2d 357 (1989)
 

GIRARD STUDIO GROUP, LTD. v. YOUNG & RUBICAM, INC.

147 A.D.2d 357 (1989)

Girard Studio Group, Ltd., Respondent, v. Young & Rubicam, Inc., Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

February 2, 1989

While it is well established that it is the function of the jury to assess damages, appropriate court intervention is in order when the amount awarded is clearly excessive. (Kupitz v Elliot, 42 A.D.2d 898.) After careful review of the within record, including the testimony of the two experts, we conclude that the amount of damages awarded to plaintiff-respondent for the loss of its photographic slides is excessive to the extent...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases