1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. B.R.
  4. 101 B.R.
  5. 101 B.R. 399 (1989)
 

IN RE MEDOMAK CANNING

Bankruptcy No. 186-00126, Adv. No. 187-0086.

101 B.R. 399 (1989)

In re MEDOMAK CANNING, Debtor. ACME ENGINEERING COMPANY, Cara Corporation, Cross-Claim Plaintiffs, v. BAYSIDE ENTERPRISES, INC., Poultry Processing, Inc., and Bernard J. Lewis, Cross-Claim Defendants.

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. of Maine.

June 15, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard E. Poulos, Portland, Me., for defendants Bayside and Poultry Processing.

Sidney St. F. Thaxter, Curtis, Thaxter, Stevens, Broder & Micoleau, Portland, Me., for Acme Engineering.

Daniel W. Sklar, Sleehan, Phinney, Bass & Green, Manchester, N.H., for Cara Corp.

Dennis G. Bezansen, So. Portland, Me., Trustee.

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

JAMES A. GOODMAN, Bankruptcy Judge.

Bayside Enterprises, Inc. ("Bayside") and Poultry Processing, Inc. ("P.P.I.") seek by motion to dismiss Acme Engineering Company's ("Acme") and Cara Corporation's ("Cara") cross-claims asserting equitable subordination1 on the grounds that claimants have failed to state a claim on which relief can be granted. Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). Bayside and P.P.I. additionally assert...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases