GLITTENBURG v. WILCENSKI

Docket No. 98313.

174 Mich. App. 321 (1989)

435 N.W.2d 480

GLITTENBURG v. WILCENSKI

Michigan Court of Appeals.

Decided January 17, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lopatin, Miller, Freedman, Bluestone, Erlich, Rosen & Bartnick (by Richard E. Shaw), for plaintiffs.

Best, Schmucker, Heyns & Klaeren, P.C. (by Chad C. Schmucker), for defendants Wilcenski.

Kerr, Russell & Weber (by Robert R. Florka and Lisa A. Lane), for Doughboy Recreational Industries.

Before: MAHER, P.J., and SHEPHERD and K. TERTZAG, JJ.


SHEPHERD, J.

Plaintiffs appeal the circuit court's order granting defendant Doughboy Recreational Industries' summary judgment motion pursuant to GCR 1963, 117.2(1) on the basis of no duty to warn. Plaintiffs unsuccessfully moved for rehearing. Plaintiffs also appeal the circuit court's January 22, 1987, order granting defendants Wilcenski's summary disposition motion pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(8) and (10) on the basis that the recreational land use statute, MCL 300...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases