1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Pa.Commw.
  4. 129 Pa.Commw.
  5. 129 Pa.Commw. 361 (1989)
 

BOROUGH OF EDGEWORTH v. LILLY

129 Pa.Commw. 361 (1989)

565 A.2d 852

BOROUGH OF EDGEWORTH, a municipal corporation v. Arthur LILLY, Catherine Russo, BHM Company, Exxon Corporation, Consolidated Rail Corporation and Albert J. Veshio. Appeal of Arthur LILLY.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

Decided November 3, 1989.

Reargument Denied January 16, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Norman J. Cowie, David M. McQuiston, Thomson, Rhodes & Cowie, Pittsburgh, for appellant.

Giles J. Gaca, Joseph W. Cavrich, Grigsby, Gaca & Davies, P.C., Pittsburgh, for Catherine Russo, et al.

Aloysius F. Mahler, David P. Helwig, Pittsburgh, for Consol. Rail Corp., et al.

Before CRAIG and DOYLE, JJ., and NARICK, Senior Judge.

NARICK, Senior Judge.

Arthur Lilly (Lilly) appeals from the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County that determined, pursuant to a declaratory action filed by the Borough of Edgeworth (Edgeworth), that a disputed section of Hazel Lane1 is owned by Catherine Russo (Russo) by virtue of adverse possession. We affirm.

I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Edgeworth commenced the action for declaratory judgment against Lilly...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases