Under the circumstances of this case, we are of the opinion that the plaintiff-appellant husband should be afforded the opportunity to contest the allegation of paternity of the son born to his wife during their marriage allegedly as a result of artificial insemination, and to invoke the protection of Domestic Relations Law § 73. The IAS court, on the defendant-respondent wife's motion for maintenance, child support and counsel fees, pendente lite, held that the husband...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
