The hearing evidence amply supports the allegations contained in specifications 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11. Other than testimony that the sexually explicit statements were made in jest, petitioner made no showing which would substantially challenge the testimony received from the four witnesses presented by the respondent. The Trial Commissioner having rejected petitioner's claim of frivolity and having credited the testimony of these witnesses, there is no support in...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
