1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 237 N.J.
  5. 237 N.J. Super. 231 (1989)
 

STATE v. MAZUREK

237 N.J. Super. 231 (1989)

567 A.2d 277

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. JOHN MAZUREK, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided December 8, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kevin H. Marino argued the cause for appellant (Robinson, Wayne & La Sala, attorneys; Kevin H. Marino on the letter brief).

James W. Kennedy, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for respondent (John Kaye, Prosecutor of Monmouth County, attorney; Patricia B. Quelch, Assistant Prosecutor, of counsel and on the letter brief).

Before Judges J.H. COLEMAN, BRODY and SKILLMAN.

The opinion of the court was delivered by COLEMAN, J.H., P.J.A.D.

The pivotal issue raised in this appeal is whether the empirical data accumulated from a particular sobriety checkpoint justifies the site selection for reasons related to public safety and to reasonably efficacious or productive law enforcement goals. We hold that the data does justify the site selection and that customary methods of detecting drunken drivers would not have been more efficacious.<...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases