We agree with the findings of the Judicial Hearing Officer that plaintiff Peter Weiden was not a tenant of the subject premises nor was it his primary residence during the tenancy of his father, Paul Weiden. Accordingly, plaintiff was not entitled to a renewal lease in his name after the death of his father (see, 9 NYCRR 2523.5 [b] [1]-[2]).
Further, there was sufficient evidence in the record for the Judicial Hearing Officer to establish use and occupancy...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
