AEGIS v. FORHAN

Docket No. 108184.

181 Mich. App. 278 (1989)

448 N.W.2d 832

AMERICAN EXPRESS GROUP & INCENTIVE SERVICES, INC v. FORHAN

Michigan Court of Appeals.

Decided November 21, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Miller, Canfield, Paddock & Stone (by Gregory L. Curtner and Robert A. Shaya), and Willkie, Farr & Gallagher (by Joseph T. Baio), of Counsel, for AEGIS and AMEXCO.

Nora, Hemming, Essad & Polaczyk, P.C. (by C. Gerald Hemming and Timothy L. Cronin), for William Forhan.

Before: MURPHY, P.J., and NEFF and G.S. ALLEN, JJ.


PER CURIAM.

Defendant, William G. Forhan, appeals as of right from a final judgment entered by the circuit court. Forhan challenges a previous order granting partial summary disposition in favor of third-party defendant, American Express Company (AMEXCO). The order Forhan challenges dismissed count III of his countercomplaint which alleged a breach of the implied contractual duties of good faith and fair dealing.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases