LEGROS v. TARR

No. 88-279.

44 Ohio St. 3d 1 (1989)

LEGROS ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. TARR ET AL., APPELLEES.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided June 28, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Carney & Broadbent and Richard O. Mazanec, for appellant Legros.

Kohrman, Jackson & Krantz, Gregory M. Lichko and Sarah Gabinet, for appellant Butcher & Singer.

Weston, Hurd, Fallon, Paisley & Howley, John S. Kluznik and Mary E. Golrick, for appellee Burning Hills Steel Co.


HOLMES, J.

The controlling issue presented by this case is whether appellants are entitled to recover a commission, or finder's fee, in quantum meruit, from appellees, based upon the theory of quasi-contract, or contract implied in law. As to one of the appellants, Butcher & Singer, we answer such query in the affirmative and thus, in this respect, reverse the court of appeals. However, we affirm the court of appeals' holding that appellant Legros, due...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases