Respondent, driving an uninsured vehicle, was involved in an accident with another vehicle which was also apparently uninsured. Respondent sought no-fault benefits from MVAIC. MVAIC refused to pay such benefits, claiming that as the driver of an uninsured vehicle, respondent was not entitled to benefits.
It is unclear whether the vehicle which respondent was driving was owned by his sister, as respondent claims, or his spouse, as petitioner MVAIC claims. It is unnecessary...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
