Defendant's only legal claim is that police testimony that defendant was sought and eventually arrested after conversations with the victim inferentially bolstered the victim's identification of defendant. Defendant never objected or moved for a mistrial at the time this testimony was received, and failed to preserve the claim as a matter of law. (CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Major,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.