GRAY BY GRAY v. POPE


236 N.J. Super. 206 (1989)

565 A.2d 411

JERMAINE GRAY, AN INFANT BY HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEM, KAREN GRAY AND KAREN GRAY, INDIVIDUALLY, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. DIANE POPE A/K/A DIANE PHILLIPS, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided October 11, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert A. Ungvary argued the cause for appellants (Forman, Forman, Cardonsky, Andril, attorneys; Robert A. Ungvary, of counsel and on the brief).

Albert E. Fershing argued the cause for respondent (Shurkin & Fershing, attorneys; Monique R. Franco, on the brief).

Before Judges SHEBELL and KEEFE.


The opinion of the court was delivered by SHEBELL, J.A.D.

Plaintiffs Jermaine Gray, an infant, and his mother Karen Gray, individually and as his guardian, appeal from the entry of a judgment of no cause for action in favor of defendant Diane Pope based upon a jury verdict which found the infant plaintiff pedestrian to be 57% negligent and the defendant auto driver to be 43% negligent in the happening of an accident that occurred on March 26, 1984.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases