CITY OF SEATTLE v. HOGAN

No. 20694-0-I.

53 Wn. App. 387 (1989)

766 P.2d 1134

THE CITY OF SEATTLE, Respondent, v. CARLOS M. HOGAN, Petitioner.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One.

January 30, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Linda Portnoy, Public Defender, for petitioner.

Douglas N. Jewett, City Attorney, and Stanley Bastian and Charlotte E. Clark-Mahoney, Assistants; Douglas B. Whalley, City Prosecutor, for respondent.


PEKELIS, J.

Carlos M. Hogan appeals from his conviction for attempted vehicle prowling on the basis that the municipal ordinance under which he was charged provides for a maximum punishment greater than that permitted for the same crime under state law. He argues that this violates (1) constitutional guaranties of equal protection and (2) Const. art. 11, § 11, providing that municipal ordinances must not conflict with general laws. We reverse and remand to the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases