DOYLE v. AMTEC MGT.


143 Misc.2d 292 (1989)

John Doyle, Plaintiff, v. Amtec Management et al., Defendants.

Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County.

April 6, 1989


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Roberts & Finger for Amtec Management and another, defendants. Stephen Sacks, defendant pro se. John Doyle, plaintiff pro se.


RICHARD S. LANE, J.

The renewal of motion by defendants Amtec Management and Norman Wasserman to vacate arbitration award in favor of plaintiff raises a significant issue in the administration of mandatory arbitration pursuant to the Rules of the Chief Judge (22 NYCRR) part 28.

The motion was originally returnable on March 10, 1989 and was denied by Judge Stuart Cohen by reason of no appearance by either side (CPLR 2216 [a]).

Without opposition...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases