Defendant's argument that the credit cards recovered from his person should have been suppressed as fruits of an illegal arrest, where he was arrested on an allegedly general and vague description, is rejected. Defendant's arrest did not occur until after he was positively identified by the victim of the crime sometime later at the precinct. The initial stop of defendant and two other suspects, meeting the description given by the victim, within an hour after the crime, near...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
