1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Conn.
  4. 212 Conn.
  5. 212 Conn. 217 (1989)
 

SCOTT v. BARRETT

(13571)

212 Conn. 217 (1989)

ROBERT D. SCOTT ET AL. v. ANDREW BARRETT ET AL.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decision released July 18, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel E. Brennan, Jr., for the appellant (named plaintiff).

Joseph B. Curran, with whom was John R. Lilliendahl, for the appellees (defendants).

SHEA, CALLAHAN, GLASS, COVELLO and HULL, JS.

GLASS, J.

In this case the named plaintiff (plaintiff) claims that the trial court erred by failing to instruct the jury to specify damages under General Statutes (Rev. to 1987) § 52-225d (b) (1),1 even though the parties did not request such an instruction or except to the court's use of a general verdict form. We find no reversible error.

The relevant facts are undisputed. On October...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases