The trial court did not deprive defendant of potentially exculpatory evidence when it precluded him from calling an optometrist as a witness, who would have testified to the popularity of a particular eyeglass style in 1983 and 1984, which type eyeglasses defendant conceded to wearing in 1986. These eyeglasses were only one item in a very detailed...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
