1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. B.R.
  4. 96 B.R.
  5. 96 B.R. 330 (1989)
 

IN RE AMAREX, INC.

Bankruptcy No. BK-82-02335(A), No. CIV-87-382-A.

96 B.R. 330 (1989)

In re AMAREX, INC., Debtor. TEMEX ENERGY, INC., Plaintiff/Appellant, v. HASTIE AND KIRSCHNER, a professional corporation, Defendant/Appellee.

United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma.

January 19, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ernest L. Nix, Davidson & Nix, Shreveport, La. and H.D. Binns, Jr., James N. Atkins, Oklahoma City, Okl., for Temex Energy, Inc.

Frank R. Monroe & Elizabeth S. Coddou, Sheinfeld, Maley & Kay, Houston, Tex. and Hastie and Kirschner by Michael Paul Kirschner, Oklahoma City, Okl., for defendant/appellee.

ORDER

ALLEY, District Judge.

This is an appeal of the bankruptcy court's order of September 26, 1986 dismissing a Complaint to Avoid Preferential Transfer. The appellant, Temex Energy, Inc. argues that the bankruptcy court erred in its interpretation of the subject plan of reorganization and in its application of certain provisions of the Bankruptcy Code. The appellee, Hastie and Kirschner (H-K) has responded, and the issues presented are ready for determination...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases