In this consolidated appeal, the defendant does not take issue with the initial judgment of conviction. The evidence was legally sufficient to show that the defendant stole over $1,500 from the company for which he was the accountant, and subsequently falsified its business cash disbursement records to conceal the theft.
The defendant's several claims in his CPL article 440 motion were properly denied by the Supreme Court. There was no abuse of discretion in the court...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.