1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.C.
  4. 299 S.C.
  5. 299 S.C. 116 (1989)
 

THOMPSON v. HAMMOND

23054

299 S.C. 116 (1989)

382 S.E.2d 900

Sidney THOMPSON, Respondent v. F.C. HAMMOND, Horry County, John Doe, and Any Other Persons Claiming an Interest Defendants, of whom Horry County and John Doe are Petitioners.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

Decided July 31, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James B. Van Osdell and Cynthia Graham Howe, of Van Osdell, Lester, Stewart, McCutchen & Brittain, P.A., Myrtle Beach, for petitioners.

John P. Henry and Emma Ruth Brittain, Conway, for respondent.

Heard Dec. 7, 1988.

Decided July 31, 1989.

TOAL, Justice:

The dispositive issue in this case is whether relief from a circuit court judgment ordering the closing of a county road should be granted because of a mistake, inadvertence, surprise, and/or excusable neglect pursuant to South Carolina Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(1). We granted certiorari to review the decision of the Court of Appeals in Thompson v. Hammond, et al.,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases