CICCHINO v. BERKELEY HEIGHTS TP.


237 N.J. Super. 175 (1989)

567 A.2d 249

DOMENICO A. CICCHINO AND BONITA D. CICCHINO HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS-CROSS-APPELLANTS, v. TOWNSHIP OF BERKELEY HEIGHTS PLANNING BOARD, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT-CROSS-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided December 6, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Barry M. Hoffman argued the cause for appellant-cross-respondent (Bernstein, Hoffman & Clark, attorneys).

Raymond P. D'Uva, argued the cause for respondents-cross-appellants.

Before Judges PRESSLER, GRUCCIO and LANDAU.


The opinion of the court was delivered by GRUCCIO, J.A.D.

This is an action in lieu of prerogative writs. Defendant Township of Berkeley Heights Planning Board (Board) appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court, Law Division, which partially reversed and remanded the Board's denial of plaintiffs Domenico A. Cicchino and Bonita D. Cicchino's application for permission to subdivide property owned by them and their...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases