RIOTTO v. VAN HOUTEN


235 N.J. Super. 177 (1989)

561 A.2d 1168

JOSEPH RIOTTO AND CATHERINE FANELLI, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. EUGENE VAN HOUTEN, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided April 28, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Spector & Dimin, attorneys for appellants (William N. Dimin, on the brief).

Hartmann, Brooks & Van Dam, attorneys for respondent (Michael P. O'Rourke, on the brief).

Before Judges DREIER and BROCHIN.


PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs appeal from a decision by Judge Eichen in the Special Civil Part dismissing plaintiff's complaint for summary dispossession. In 1981 plaintiffs were in the process of converting their apartment house to condominium ownership. Plaintiffs contend that at that time they gave defendant notice of their intention to convert the building. As defendant had not exercised his conversion rights, plaintiffs, after waiting three years, in 1984 gave him a...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases