IN THE MATTERS OF NJ TRANSIT BUS OPERATIONS, INC., NEW JERSEY TRANSIT CORPORATION AND AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION, NEW JERSEY COUNCIL; NJ TRANSIT MERCER, INC., NEW JERSEY TRANSIT CORPORATION AND UNITED TRANSPORTATION UNION, LOCAL 33 (PATERSON AND WARWICK DIVS.); NJ TRANSIT BUS OPERATIONS, NEW JERSEY TRANSIT CORPORATION AND TRANSPORT WORKERS UNION OF AMERICA, LOCAL 225.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued February 16, 1989.
Decided May 10, 1989.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Malcolm A. Goldstein, of the New York bar, argued the cause pro hac vice for respondent Local 225, Transport Workers Union of America, AFL-CIO (Feintuch & Porwich, attorneys).
Zazzali, Zazzali, Fagella & Nowak, attorneys for respondent United Transportation Union, Local 33 (Paterson and Warwick Divisions); Robert A. Fagella, of counsel.
Jeffrey Burstein, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for appellants NJ Transit Bus Operations, Inc., NJ Transit Mercer, Inc. and New Jersey Transit Corporation (Peter N. Perretti, Jr., Attorney General, attorney; Andrea M. Silkowitz, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel; Jeffrey Burstein and Harriet H. Miller, Deputy Attorneys General, on the brief).
Robert E. Anderson, General Counsel, argued the cause for respondent Public Employment Relations Commission.
Jeffrey Freund, of the District of Columbia bar, argued the cause pro hac vice for respondents The Amalgamated Transit Union, New Jersey Council, The Amalgamated Transit Union Div. 540 and The Amalgamated Transit Union, AFL-CIO (Reitman, Parsonnet, Maisel & Duggin and Weitzman & Rich, attorneys).
Before Judges GAULKIN, BILDER and R.S. COHEN.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
The opinion of the court was delivered by GAULKIN, P.J.A.D.
In ruling on a series of scope of negotiation petitions filed by the bus operating subsidiaries of New Jersey Transit Corporation (NJT), the Public Employment Relations Commission (PERC) defined for NJT bus employees a scope of negotiations broader than that available to other public employees. NJT appeals.
I.
NJT was created by the Public Transportation Act of 1979 (PTA) to "provide for...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.