1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 236 N.J.
  5. 236 N.J. Super. 158 (1989)
 

PRISMATIC DEV. v. SOMERSET COUNTY

236 N.J. Super. 158 (1989)

564 A.2d 1208

PRISMATIC DEVELOPMENT CORP., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. SOMERSET COUNTY BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS AND TURNER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided September 27, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harry L. Garman argued the cause for appellant (Garman & Amdur, attorneys; Harry L. Garman and Sanford Amdur, on the brief).

William E. Ozzard argued the cause for respondent Somerset County Board of Chosen Freeholders (Ozzard, Wharton, Rizzolo, Klein, Mauro, Savo & Hogan, attorneys; William E. Ozzard and Arthur D. Fialk, on the brief).

Bruce D. Meller argued the cause for respondent Turner Construction Company, Inc. (Peckar & Abramson, attorneys; Bruce D. Meller and Caroline M. Rossi, on the brief).

Before Judges BILDER, ASHBEY and ARNOLD M. STEIN.

The opinion of the court was delivered by BILDER, J.A.D.

This case involves a public contract for the construction of a new county administration building in Somerville. As in Carney v. Trenton, 235 N.J.Super. 372 (App.Div. 1988), the project is governed by the Local Public Contracts Law, N.J.S.A. 40A:11-1 et seq. The question presented is whether a prospective prime contractor for a single overall contract...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases