1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 115 N.J.
  5. 115 N.J. 256 (1989)
 

GRAVES v. CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC.

115 N.J. 256 (1989)

558 A.2d 463

WILLIAM GRAVES AND JOYCE A. GRAVES, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. CHURCH & DWIGHT COMPANY, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided June 1, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard Galex argued the cause for appellant (Garruto, Galex & Cantor, attorneys; Richard Galex and Daniel L. Carroll, on the briefs).

Adrian I. Karp argued the cause for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

The members of the Court being equally divided, the judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed.

O'HERN, J., concurring.

This appeal presents an essentially factual controversy about the application of the discovery rule. "The history and principles underlying the discovery rule have been examined by us on numerous occasions." Abboud v. Viscomi, 111 N.J. 56, 62 (1988); see Vispisiano v. Ashland...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases