1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Conn.
  4. 212 Conn.
  5. 212 Conn. 157 (1989)
 

TARNOPOL v. CONNECTICUT SITING COUNCIL

(13656)

212 Conn. 157 (1989)

MICHAEL TARNOPOL ET AL. v. CONNECTICUT SITING COUNCIL ET AL.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decision released July 18, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Alan R. Spirer, with whom, on the brief, was Jan A. Marcus, for the appellants (plaintiffs).

Phyllis E. Lemell, assistant attorney general, with whom, on the brief, were Clarine Nardi Riddle, acting attorney general, and Joseph I. Lieberman, former attorney general, for the appellee (named defendant).

James A. Wade, with whom, on the brief, was Raymond T. DeMeo, for the appellee (defendant Metro Mobile CTS of Fairfield County, Inc.).

SHEA, CALLAHAN, GLASS, COVELLO and HULL, JS.

CALLAHAN, J.

The issue in this case is whether the trial court erred in granting the motions of the defendants, Metro Mobile CTS of Fairfield County, Inc. (Metro Mobile), and the Connecticut siting council (council), to dismiss the plaintiffs' administrative appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Because the plaintiffs failed to comply with the service requirements of General Statutes § 4-183 (b)1

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases