CZUJ v. TORESCO ENTERS.


239 N.J. Super. 123 (1989)

570 A.2d 1049

JANUSZ CZUJ, PLAINTIFF, v. TORESCO ENTERPRISES, D/B/A/, AUTOLAND AND FORD MOTOR COMPANY, DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division Union County.

Decided November 17, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David E. Sherman, for plaintiff (Howard Schwartz, attorney).

James S. Dobis, for defendants (Dobis & Reilly, attorneys).


MENZA, J.S.C.

This issue in this case is whether an admission of fact made by an attorney during the course of settlement negotiations is admissible against his client.

This issue has not been decided by the New Jersey courts. Plaintiff's attorney moves to quash a subpoena ad testificandum served upon him by defendant. Plaintiff, who purchased an automobile from defendant, Toresco Enterprises, doing business as Autoland, has brought suit under the Lemon...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases