BENHAM, Judge.
This appeal is from appellant's conviction of burglary. He complains of the State's use of evidence of a previous burglary for which he was tried and acquitted, and of prosecutorial misconduct. We agree that the introduction of evidence concerning the burglary of which appellant was acquitted was error, and reverse.
1. At the trial of the burglary of which appellant was acquitted, he did not deny his presence at the burglary, but swore that...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
