1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 147 A.D.2d
  5. 147 A.D.2d 208 (1989)
 

SLUTSKY v. BLOOMING GROVE INN

147 A.D.2d 208 (1989)

Leonard Slutsky, Respondent, v. Blooming Grove Inn, Inc., Appellant, et al., Defendants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

June 19, 1989

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sichol & Hicks, P. C. (Brian M. Gibson of counsel), for appellant.

Ferraro Rogers Dranoff Greenbaum Goldstein & Miller (Thomas C. Yatto of counsel), for respondent.

MANGANO, J. P., BROWN and SULLIVAN, JJ., concur.

HARWOOD, J.

We are called upon by the appeal from the final judgment herein to determine, among other things, whether a vacatur of a notice of pendency because of the invalidity of the underlying service of process (see, Dashew v Cantor, 85 A.D.2d 619) would preclude entry of a judgment in the plaintiff's favor in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases