1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 230 N.J.
  5. 230 N.J. Super. 111 (1989)
 

BIDNICK v. HANOVER INS. CO., INC.

230 N.J. Super. 111 (1989)

552 A.2d 1023

ROBERT BIDNICK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. HANOVER INSURANCE COMPANY, INC., AND N.J. AUTOMOBILE FULL INSURANCE UNDERWRITING ASSOCIATION, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided January 27, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Matthew J. Connahan argued the cause for appellants (Maloof, Lebowitz & Bubb, attorneys; Catherine M. Langlois, of counsel and on the brief).

Lewis R. Shafer argued the cause for respondent (Shurkin & Fershing, attorneys; Lewis R. Shafer, on the brief).

Before Judges LONG, MUIR, Jr., and KEEFE.

The opinion of the court was delivered by MUIR, Jr., J.A.D.

When the Legislature enacted the New Jersey Full Insurance Availability Act (Act), N.J.S.A. 17:30E-1 et seq., it did so to provide New Jersey insurance consumers with automobile insurance at standard market rates. See N.J.S.A. 17:30E-2. It designed the Act so that only persons domiciled in New Jersey qualified for automobile insurance policies issued by servicing carriers on behalf of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases