Defendant's contention concerning the propriety of the court's supplemental jury instruction was not preserved for appellate review as a matter of law. (CPL 470.05 [2].) In any event the court's supplemental instruction relating to the concept of intent was responsive to the jury's inquiry. (See, People v Malloy,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.