1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 147 A.D.2d
  5. 147 A.D.2d 194 (1989)
 

MATTER OF CURCIO v. BOYLE

147 A.D.2d 194 (1989)

In the Matter of Pasquale J. Curcio et al., Respondents, v. E. Thomas Boyle et al., Appellants, et al., Respondents

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

June 7, 1989

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bower & Gardner (John J. Bower, Stanley Fink and Barry G. Saretsky of counsel), for appellants.

Schapiro & Reich (Perry S. Reich and Steven Schapiro of counsel), for Pasquale J. Curcio and another, and Bracken & Margolin (Martin Bradley Ashare of counsel), for David J. Wilmott, respondents. (One brief filed.)

Pelletreau & Pelletreau (Brian McCaffrey of counsel), for Harold J. Withers, respondent.

RUBIN, J. P., SULLIVAN, HARWOOD and BALLETTA, JJ., concur.

Per Curiam.

The petitioners Pasquale J. Curcio, John Andrew Kay and David J. Wilmott are the proponents of an initiative measure (see, Suffolk County Charter § C7-2) which would place a referendum on the ballot to amend the Suffolk County Charter by dissolving the current 18-member County Legislature, and replacing it with a 10-member Board of Supervisors. Under this proposal, the Board of Supervisors, consisting...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases