1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Conn.
  4. 211 Conn.
  5. 211 Conn. 129 (1989)
 

GREATER BRIDGEPORT TRANSIT DISTRICT v. CHRO

(13620)

211 Conn. 129 (1989)

GREATER BRIDGEPORT TRANSIT DISTRICT v. COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS AND OPPORTUNITIES ET AL.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decision released May 9, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John T. Bochanis, with whom, on the brief, was Thomas J. Weihing, for the appellant (plaintiff).

Charles Krich, staff attorney, with whom, on the brief, was Philip A. Murphy, Jr., commission counsel, for the appellee (named defendant).

PETERS, C. J., SHEA, CALLAHAN, GLASS and HULL, Js.

PER CURIAM.

The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether an employer charged with age discrimination may seek injunctive relief to avoid responding to interrogatories propounded by the administrative agency authorized to investigate such complaints. The defendant Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities (CHRO) received a complaint from the defendant Frank T. Comparato, charging that the plaintiff, Greater Bridgeport Transit District, had discharged Comparato...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases