1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 156 A.D.2d
  5. 156 A.D.2d 181 (1989)
 

RUSSELL v. HENSHEL

156 A.D.2d 181 (1989)

Muriel Russell, Respondent, v. Joy Henshel et al., Appellants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

December 7, 1989

Questions of fact concerning the status of the apartment make this case inappropriate for disposition by means of summary judgment. There are sufficient collateral writings (see, Crabtree v Arden Sales Corp., 305 N.Y. 48; Marks v Cowdin, 226 N.Y. 138) so as to provide a basis for admitting parol evidence regarding the nature of this transaction and, thereby, satisfy the Statute...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases