BD. OF EDUC. v. SARGENT


146 A.D.2d 190 (1989)

Board of Education of the Hudson City School District, Appellant-Respondent, v. Sargent, Webster, Crenshaw & Folley, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent-Appellant. Thompson Construction Corporation, Third-Party Defendant-Respondent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.

April 6, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rapport, Meyers, Griffen & Whitbeck (Victor M. Meyers of counsel), for appellant-respondent.

Donohue, Sabo, Varley & Armstrong, P. C. (Kenneth G. Varley of counsel), for defendant and third-party plaintiff-respondent-appellant.

Couch, White, Brenner, Howard & Feigenbaum (Sharon Couch DeBonis of counsel), for third-party defendant-respondent.

WEISS, J. P., MIKOLL, YESAWICH, JR., and HARVEY, JJ., concur.


LEVINE, J.

In 1966, plaintiff, the Board of Education of the Hudson City School District (hereinafter the School District), entered into an agreement with defendant, Sargent, Webster, Crenshaw & Folley (hereinafter the Architect), on a standard form of agreement of the American Institute of Architects (hereinafter AIA) for the provision of plans and specifications and supervisory

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases