1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 231 N.J.
  5. 231 N.J. Super. 103 (1989)
 

MURRAY BY OLSEN v. SHIMALLA

231 N.J. Super. 103 (1989)

555 A.2d 24

KEITH MURRAY, AN INFANT BY HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEM, OTTO OLSEN, AND OTTO OLSEN, INDIVIDUALLY, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. PATRICK SHIMALLA, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, AND DOUGLAS MURRAY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided February 28, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles P. Hopkins II, argued the cause for appellant (Richard J. Sauerwein, attorney; Charles P. Hopkins II on the brief).

John R. Gorman argued the cause for respondent Keith Murray (Lutz & Shafranski, attorneys; John R. Gorman, on the brief).

Richard D. Millet argued the cause for respondent Patrick Shimalla (Hampson & Millet, attorneys; Richard D. Millet, on the brief).

Before Judges BRODY, ASHBEY and SKILLMAN.

The opinion of the court was delivered by BRODY, J.A.D.

Ten-year-old Keith Murray (plaintiff), by his guardian ad litem, and his guardian ad litem individually1 brought this personal injury action against plaintiff's father (defendant) and Patrick Shimalla, another young boy. The two boys and a third young boy, Chris Hague, were using gasoline to make a fire in a wooded area behind the Murray home. The boys had obtained the gasoline from...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases