On appeal, defendant claims that the court violated express statutory requirements by allowing testimony to be read back to the jury in his absence. A criminal defendant had the right to be present at all material stages of trial, including the court's response to a request for a readback (People v Mehmedi,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. SCOTT
156 A.D.2d 160 (1989)
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Fred Scott, Appellant
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
December 7, 1989
December 7, 1989
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.