BALL v. PRENTICE

No. 2 CA-CV 89-0049.

162 Ariz. 150 (1989)

781 P.2d 628

Gerad L. BALL, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. William PRENTICE, Defendant/Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2, Department B.

September 28, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John D. Kaufman and Kathleen O'Dea, Tucson, for plaintiff/appellant.

Slutes, Sakrison, Even, Grant & Pelander, P.C. by Christopher C. Browning and Claire Kiehl Lefkowitz, Tucson, for defendant/appellee.


OPINION

LACAGNINA, Judge.

Gerad L. Ball appeals from adverse partial summary judgments on his negligence claim against William Prentice and the Estate of Jane Prentice, deceased. The trial court ruled he had no claim for negligent infliction of emotional distress, and that he either had no claim for punitive damages or he had not made a sufficient showing on the issue of punitive damages to entitle him to pretrial discovery of Prentice's assets.

We...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases