1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 150 Wis.2d
  5. 150 Wis.2d 161 (1989)
 

HANLEY IMPLEMENT v. RIESTERER EQUIP.

No. 88-1661.

150 Wis.2d 161 (1989)

441 N.W.2d 304

HANLEY IMPLEMENT CO., INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. RIESTERER EQUIPMENT, INC., Defendant-Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

Decided April 11, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For plaintiff-appellant there was a brief submitted by Robert Brill and John P. Ebben of Brill & Eustice, S.C., of Sun Prairie.

For defendant-respondent there was a brief submitted by Richard Lubinski of Lubinski, Rottier & Lubinski, of Seymour.

Before Cane, P.J., LaRocque and Myse, JJ.

CANE, P.J.

Hanley Implement Co., Inc., appeals a summary judgment dismissing its conversion suit against Riesterer Equipment, Inc. The suit alleged that Riesterer purchased, took possession of, and refused to return a piece of farm equipment known as a cornhead while Hanley held a security interest on the machine. Initially, Hanley had filed a financing statement to perfect its security interest in the cornhead, but allowed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases