1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 212 Cal.App.3d
  5. 212 Cal.App.3d 96 (1989)
 

YOUNG v. ROSENTHAL

Docket Nos. B033315, B025896, B024983, B026834 and B026937.

212 Cal.App.3d 96 (1989)

260 Cal. Rptr. 369

J.M. YOUNG, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. JEROME B. ROSENTHAL, Defendant and Appellant. J.M. YOUNG, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. JEROME B. ROSENTHAL, Defendant and Respondent; ORING, MARGOLESE & SCHULTE, Objector and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Three.

July 18, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Cooper, Epstein & Hurewitz, Richard D. Agay and Kenneth A. Weissman for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Ronald P. Kaplan for Defendant and Appellant.

Oring, Margolese & Schulte and Vana Parker Margolese for Objector and Appellant.

OPINION

CROSKEY, J.

In this case, involving five separate appeals, we are presented with an incredibly obscene example of the defiance, subversion and abuse of the judicial system in general and the procedures for pretrial discovery in particular. In affirming a summary judgment and two trial court sanction orders, we write what should be the final chapter of the unsuccessful efforts of a disbarred lawyer to avoid paying fees for...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases