1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 232 N.J.
  5. 232 N.J. Super. 69 (1989)
 

DiNICOLA v. WATCHUNG FURNITURE

232 N.J. Super. 69 (1989)

556 A.2d 367

KENNETH P. DINICOLA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, CROSS-RESPONDENT, v. WATCHUNG FURNITURE'S COUNTRY MANOR, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, CROSS-APPELLANT. and TEMPLE STUART, DEFENDANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided April 5, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Allan Marain argued the cause for appellant, cross-respondent.

James A. Mella argued the cause for respondent, cross-appellant (Weiseman, Mella & Ruotolo, attorneys; Seamus Boyle on the brief).

Before Judges J.H. COLEMAN and BAIME.

The opinion of the court was delivered by COLEMAN, J.H., P.J.A.D.

This appeal arises from claims for breach of warranties and Consumer Fraud Act violations related to the purchase of household furniture. At the conclusion of a jury trial, plaintiff was awarded $600 in compensatory damages for breach of warranties. The damages were tripled because of an alleged violation of a regulation promulgated pursuant to N.J.S.A. 56:8-4. Counsel fees of $1,875 were allowed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases