1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 230 N.J.
  5. 230 N.J. Super. 63 (1989)
 

ARONSOHN & SPRINGSTEAD v. WEISSMAN

230 N.J. Super. 63 (1989)

552 A.2d 649

ARONSOHN & SPRINGSTEAD AND RICHARD F. ARONSOHN, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, CROSS-APPELLANTS, v. JONAS WEISSMAN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, CROSS-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided January 19, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jack Jay Wind argued the cause for appellant, cross-respondent (Margulies, Wind, Herrington & Katz, attorneys, Jack Jay Wind, on the brief).

Richard H. Weiner argued the cause for respondents, cross-appellants (Aronsohn, Springstead & Weiner, attorneys, Richard F. Aronsohn and Mark S. Paige, on the brief).

Before Judges PRESSLER, O'BRIEN and SCALERA.

The opinion of the court was delivered by PRESSLER, P.J.A.D.

The issue of first impression raised by this appeal is whether a so-called Keogh retirement plan maintained by a self-employed professional for his own exclusive account may be levied upon by a judgment creditor under a writ of execution. The trial judge, concluding that such an account is not exempt from execution, issued a turnover order requiring the depository...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases