The court properly exercised its discretion in imposing monetary sanctions for defendant's failure to provide responses to discovery notices. Defendant's explanation that the delay was the result of its president's death three months prior to service of the discovery notice was insufficient, especially because defendant failed to avail itself of statutory remedies provided for circumstances where timely response is impossible. The court was therefore fully justified in imposing...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
